Hann Law Firm
Business Hours
Mountain View compresses a lot of traffic into a small footprint. Central Expressway moves commuters at highway speeds through the middle of town while the 101, 85, and 237 interchanges knot together at its edges, and the firm’s Mountain View caseload tracks that geography: rear-end and interchange collisions on the highway side, plus pedestrians and cyclists struck around Castro Street.
Hann Law Firm represents Mountain View residents in those cases from downtown San Jose, with no Mountain View branch. Claims do fine that way: whatever a lawsuit needs happens in writing, over the phone, or at the Santa Clara County Superior Court, where every Mountain View case is heard anyway.
Hurt in a rideshare? The coverage depends on the app’s clock
Mountain View runs on rideshares. The Googleplex corridor moves thousands of commuters daily, and on concert nights Shoreline Amphitheatre pushes upward of 20,000 people through the Shoreline Boulevard and 101 interchange in a couple of hours, a surge that arrives and leaves largely by app. Rideshare crashes produce a coverage puzzle that regular car accidents do not. Which insurance applies depends on what the driver’s app was doing at the moment of impact. With the app off, only the driver’s personal auto policy is in play, and many personal policies exclude commercial driving entirely. Once the app is on, coverage steps up in two stages: limited contingent coverage while the driver waits for a request, commonly $50,000 per person for injuries, and the platform’s full commercial policy, generally $1,000,000, from ride acceptance through drop-off.
The practical problem is that each insurer in that chain has a reason to argue the crash belongs to a different phase than the one it covers. Passengers get bounced between the driver’s carrier and the platform’s; struck pedestrians may never learn a rideshare was involved unless someone digs. The evidence that settles the phase question is unglamorous and perishable: the trip receipt and the platform’s own ride data, which gets produced when a lawyer asks in the right legal form and rarely otherwise. If a rideshare touches your crash in any role, passenger, driver, cyclist, or pedestrian, preserve the receipt and say so at the consultation, because it changes which doors the claim knocks on.
The same phase logic reaches delivery drivers. Food and package delivery runs constantly through Mountain View’s apartment corridors, and a collision with a delivery driver raises the identical question in different clothing: was the driver mid-delivery, or off the clock? Each answer points at a different policy, and the platforms’ coverage tiers are thinner than the rideshare equivalents, which makes the driver’s personal policy and your own underinsured coverage matter more. The delivery record settles the phase, and it lives on the platform’s servers, retrievable the same way ride data is.
A Central Expressway rear-end, walked through
Here’s a composite scenario, invented for illustration only, not a description of any real Mountain View client or case. A commuter is stopped in Central Expressway traffic near one of its signaled crossings when the car behind fails to brake in time, a common pattern on a road built for highway speeds but interrupted by cross streets. The impact is moderate, the kind that sends a driver to urgent care rather than a trauma unit, and the at-fault driver’s insurer calls within two days with an offer that covers the visit and stops there. What the early number misses: an MRI three weeks later turns up a disc injury the initial exam couldn’t see, and the treatment plan that follows runs another four months. Because the claim wasn’t signed away on day three, the file still includes what the MRI found. Central Expressway is incidental to the lesson: an urgent-care bill and an actual injury are two different numbers, and that gap rarely shows itself before a second visit, which an early signature would have erased.
Seven questions Mountain View clients ask most:
How long do I have to file? Two years from the injury, for most California claims. Involving a government entity, which public-road crashes sometimes do, can compress that to a six-month claim deadline. The practical deadline is tighter still: witnesses scatter and camera footage gets overwritten long before any statute runs, so the useful clock is measured in weeks.
The insurer says the crash was partly my fault. Is my claim dead? No. California follows comparative negligence, meaning a percentage of fault trims the recovery and the claim survives. Adjusters count on people assuming a fault argument ends the matter, and an inflated fault percentage is one of the oldest tools in the drawer. Treat whatever number they float as an opening bid.
Will my case go to trial? Probably it settles, and the way it gets prepared is a big part of why. A file built as though a jury will see it changes what the insurer offers, because their math includes the cost of losing. When a fair settlement never materializes, James Hann tries the case. Either way, nobody pushes you toward a fast exit that fits the insurer’s calendar better than your recovery.
The other driver had no insurance. Is there anywhere to turn? Often yes: your own policy’s uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage exists for exactly this, and it also reaches hit-and-run drivers who are never found. Claims against your own carrier still get resisted and still benefit from documentation, and California law generally restricts insurers from raising rates over accidents that were not your fault, though the specifics are worth confirming for your policy. Check your declarations page for UM/UIM limits; most Mountain View drivers are pleasantly surprised they have it.
I feel mostly fine. Should I still see a doctor? Yes, and promptly. Adrenaline masks injuries for days, and concussion and soft-tissue symptoms surface late. An insurer reads any treatment gap as proof the crash was minor. Getting checked protects your health first and your claim second, in that order.
The crash happened while I was driving for work. Does workers’ compensation change things? It adds a second track rather than replacing the first. Work comp covers medical care and partial wages regardless of fault, while the injury claim against the at-fault driver covers what comp does not, including pain and suffering. The two systems interact, and coordinating them, including the liens comp carriers assert on third-party recoveries, is part of the job. What matters at the start is telling the lawyer both facts.
Does the firm handle divorce and family law for Mountain View? Yes, and Mountain View generates a steady stream of it. Divorce, child custody and visitation, and support matters for Mountain View families run through the firm’s family law practice, with divorce work handled by the same office; those cases are heard in Santa Clara County’s family courts, and the same direct-attorney approach applies. When an injury case and a family matter collide, a crash mid-divorce, a support order complicated by lost wages, having both under one roof stops the two problems from being handled as strangers.
What does finding out cost? Nothing. The consultation is free: James reviews what happened, explains what the claim looks like under California law, and the decision stays yours. Call (408) 755-9793.
The injury side of the practice, car accidents, motorcycle crashes, falls, and the rest, is mapped out on the San Jose personal injury page. Mountain View clients also bring the firm criminal defense work, business disputes, civil suits, and family law, heard the same as everything else in Santa Clara County’s courts.
(408) 755-9793 reaches the office directly; after hours, the contact form does the same job.