Hann Law Firm
Business Hours
Palo Alto has a real bike culture, and the injury work reflects it. The city’s own safety data makes the point: 62 percent of Palo Alto’s injury collisions happen on just 4 percent of its streets, with El Camino Real and the Charleston-Arastradero corridor at the top of the list. Cyclists and pedestrians share those streets with commuter traffic bound for the 101 and 280, and the case that emerges again and again involves a person on foot or on two wheels, badly hurt by a driver whose insurer will soon suggest the victim appeared out of nowhere.
One side of the story gets written down first
That suggestion often makes it into the collision report itself. Officers arrive after the fact; the driver is standing there able to give a statement while the cyclist rides to the hospital. Reports written under those conditions lean toward the person who could talk.
James Hann understands that failure mode from the inside. Before law school, he spent five years as a police dispatcher for the UC San Diego Police Department, at the center of investigations as they happened, hearing what officers recorded and what never made it into the file. When a bicycle accident case arrives with a report that blamed the rider by default, he knows which gaps to attack: the witness never interviewed, the skid marks never measured, the intersection camera nobody requested before the footage cycled out. A police report is a starting document, and injured cyclists get talked out of good claims when everyone involved treats it as the final word.
Here is a hypothetical walkthrough of how the rebuild works; every detail is invented, and it describes no actual case or outcome of the firm’s. A cyclist on a Palo Alto bike boulevard gets right-hooked by a driver turning into a driveway; the report, written while the rider was in the ambulance, records the driver’s account and nothing else. The rebuild starts within days: a canvass turns up a homeowner camera two doors down, and its footage shows the turn cutting across the bike lane without a signal. A witness the report never mentioned responds to a mailer. The bent frame and the road-rash photographs get preserved before anyone repairs or discards anything. By the time the demand goes out, the report’s version is a footnote rather than the record. That sequence, not courtroom theatrics, is what moves these cases; it just has to start before the footage loop overwrites itself.
Blame is the other standard move. Every share of fault an insurer pins on a cyclist shrinks what it pays, so pushing an inflated share back toward the truth is often where the real money in a claim lives, and it takes hard evidence and a lawyer willing to litigate the point.
Pedestrians carry the same burden of proof
Pedestrian cases deserve a word of their own here. Palo Alto’s downtown grid moves heavy foot traffic across University and its side streets all day, and a pedestrian struck in a marked crosswalk still ends up litigating attention: the insurer will comb phone records for a distraction argument and question witnesses about walking speed. California gives pedestrians strong right-of-way protections, and the same evidence rules apply, so the crosswalk timing data, the driver’s phone records, and the intersection geometry all become fair game in both directions. Pedestrian injuries also tend toward the severe end, which makes future-care documentation even more decisive; for Palo Alto clients that treatment record is often built at Stanford Health Care, a few minutes from where these collisions happen, and thorough records from day one become the backbone of the claim.
Where the coverage hides
Palo Alto also generates claims that scarcely existed a decade ago. A rider thrown from a rented e-scooter lands somewhere between product liability and driver negligence, with the city’s own road maintenance sometimes a third factor. James practices business law alongside injury work, and reading the rental agreement and permit terms closely is often where the real coverage question gets answered. Hurt in a rideshare instead? That coverage puzzle has its own treatment on the firm’s Mountain View page.
The firm’s full injury practice, from car accidents through premises and wrongful death cases, is described on the San Jose personal injury page; criminal defense and family law round out the practice too, alongside the firm’s business and civil litigation work, for Palo Alto clients with more than one problem to solve.
One practical note about geography. Hann Law Firm’s office sits in downtown San Jose, twenty-five minutes down the 101 or 280 on a good day, but a Palo Alto case is not won or lost by proximity to that office. It is won or lost in the weeks right after the crash, while the report still says what it says and the camera footage two doors down from the intersection hasn’t looped over yet. A consultation happens by phone as easily as in person, and what needs to happen quickly, the canvass and the preservation letters going out, doesn’t care where the lawyer’s desk sits.
Send the details through the contact form or call (408) 755-9793 for the free consultation. Bring the collision report if you have it; that is usually where the work starts.